This action was commenced by filing a summons with notice, which was signed on behalf of the entity plaintiffs and Joelle Kelly by two lawyers in Washington State who were not admitted to practice law in the State of New York. The lawyers also affixed the signature of plaintiff Brian Kelly, designating him as a pro se plaintiff who had given permission for them to sign on his behalf. In response to defendant Katten's demand for a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SALT AIRE TRADING LLC v. SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD, LLP
7019, 603799/07.
93 A.D.3d 452 (2012)
940 N.Y.S.2d 222
2012 NY Slip Op 1735
SALT AIRE TRADING LLC et al., Appellants, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD, LLP, et al., Defendants, and KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2012.
Decided March 8, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
