ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention, in effect, that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because it failed to allege every material element of the crimes charged, is without merit. "[T]he indictment effectively charge[d] . . . defendant with the commission of a particular crime and afforded him fair notice of the charges made against him, so that he [could] prepare a defense and . . . avoid subsequent attempts to retry him for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.