1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 92 A.D.3d
  5. 92 A.D.3d 405 (2012)
 

LAPIDUS & ASSOC., LLP v. ELIZABETH ST., INC.

6701, 601955/05

92 A.D.3d 405 (2012)

937 N.Y.S.2d 227

2012 NY Slip Op 707

LAPIDUS & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Respondent, v. ELIZABETH STREET, INC., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 2, 2012.

The record demonstrates that defendants failed to dispute that plaintiff sent them the subject invoices and that no objections were lodged thereto until after this action had been commenced (see Bartning v Bartning, 16 A.D.3d 249, 250 [2005]). Defendants' challenges to the reasonableness of plaintiff's fees fail. In the context of an account stated pertaining to legal fees, a firm does "not have to establish the reasonableness of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases