Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries he sustained when he was struck by a motor vehicle operated by an employee of defendants' franchisees. Plaintiff's theory of the case is vicarious liability based on agency. However, the pleadings allege no facts to substantiate the assertion that the motor vehicle operator was defendants' agent (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
