ELNAKIB v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

2011-00104.

90 A.D.3d 596 (2011)

934 N.Y.S.2d 223

2011 NY Slip Op 8898

AMRO M. ELNAKIB, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 6, 2011.


Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

To succeed on a motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to CPLR 4401, a defendant has the burden of showing that there is no rational process by which the jury could find in favor of the plaintiff and against the moving defendant (see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 556 [1997]; Velez v Goldenberg,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases