Apart from the fact that the complaint amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiff's divorce judgment, it fails to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). The fraud allegations are insufficiently detailed (see CPLR 3016 [b]), and the remaining allegations consist of bare legal conclusions (see Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CANGRO v. MARANGOS
6277, 111339/09
90 A.D.3d 470 (2011)
933 N.Y.S.2d 866
2011 NY Slip Op 8835
JENNIFER CANGRO, Appellant, v. JOHN Z. MARANGOS, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 8, 2011.
Decided December 8, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.