On appeal, defendants argue that the motion court abused its discretion in limiting discovery to a seven year period measured from the allegations in the complaint. Defendants contend that the statute of limitations was an inappropriate tool to limit discovery because of plaintiff's status as a fiduciary, with a duty to account. Defendants also argue that the pre-2004 records are a part of, and shed light on, the self-dealing carried out by plaintiff within the statutory...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
