1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 89 A.D.3d
  5. 89 A.D.3d 1058 (2011)
 

GELDA v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.

2011-06088.

89 A.D.3d 1058 (2011)

933 N.Y.S.2d 611

2011 NY Slip Op 8722

ELAINE GELDA et al., Appellants, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 29, 2011.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to compel the defendant to produce additional employees for depositions. A corporation has the right to designate, in the first instance, which of its employees will appear for a deposition (see Trueforge Global Mach. Corp. v Viraj Group, 84 A.D.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases