1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 91 A.D.3d
  5. 91 A.D.3d 92 (2011)
 

VILLAGE TAXI CORP. v. BELTRE

2009-08516

91 A.D.3d 92 (2011)

933 N.Y.S.2d 694

2011 NY Slip Op 8584

VILLAGE TAXI CORP. et al., Appellants, v. RAMON BELTRE et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 22, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danzig Fishman & Decea, White Plains ( Yenisey Rodriguez-McCloskey of counsel), for appellants.

Michael F. Keesee , Port Chester, for Ramon Beltre and another, respondents.

Vouté, Lohrfink, Magro & Collins, LLP, White Plains ( Ralph F. Schoene of counsel), for Carlos Pereyra and another, respondents.

FLORIO, J.P., HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

LEVENTHAL, J.

A contract that violates municipal regulations which exist for the protection of public health or morals may be illegal and unenforceable (see Benjamin v Koeppel, 85 N.Y.2d 549, 553 [1995]). On this appeal, which arises from the sale of the outstanding capital stock and assets of certain taxi companies located within the Village of Port Chester, we consider, among other things...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases