The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, including its evaluation of the arresting officer's use of documents to refresh his recollection.
Defendant claims that the arresting officer, who testified to the detailed radioed description on which he relied, and then testified that defendant matched that description, was also required to testify as to defendant's actual appearance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
