Defendant made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the accident. Defendant submitted affirmed reports of an orthopedist and neurologist reporting normal ranges of motion in all tested body areas, specifying the objective tests they used to arrive at the measurements, and concluding that plaintiff's injuries were resolved (see De La Cruz v Hernandez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DURAN v. JEONG HOY
6037, 7152/06.
89 A.D.3d 541 (2011)
932 N.Y.S.2d 484
2011 NY Slip Op 8213
MIGUEL DURAN, Respondent, v. JEONG HOY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 15, 2011.
Decided November 15, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
