The court did not abuse its discretion in finding that defendant's underlying motion for an emergency stay contained "false charges [against plaintiff] that were expressed by means of a tortured and very partial rendering of the facts that can only have been deliberately crafted to mislead" and was therefore frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see e.g. Rogovin v Rogovin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WEISBURST v. DREIFUS
6025N, 312352/07.
89 A.D.3d 536 (2011)
932 N.Y.S.2d 689
2011 NY Slip Op 8207
SANFORD WEISBURST, Respondent, v. JOANNA DREIFUS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 15, 2011.
Decided November 15, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
