The IAS court providently exercised its discretion, in the interest of justice, by granting plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint. The court properly considered pertinent factors such as plaintiff's showing of merit, the expiration of the statute of limitations, the prompt receipt of plaintiff's notice of claim by defendant's insurer, and the failure of defendant's employee to provide contact information for himself or defendant at...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
