MULLIGAN v. RAUSCH

2010-10315.

89 A.D.3d 811 (2011)

932 N.Y.S.2d 360

2011 NY Slip Op 8128

THOMAS MULLIGAN, Respondent, v. HARRY A. RAUSCH, JR., et al., Appellants, and AGOSTINO CERVONE, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 9, 2011.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined there were triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases