1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 89 A.D.3d
  5. 89 A.D.3d 514 (2011)
 

MEJIA-ORTIZ v. INOA

6000N, 6049/07

89 A.D.3d 514 (2011)

932 N.Y.S.2d 335

2011 NY Slip Op 7940

RAMON MEJIA-ORTIZ, Appellant, v. GAVIN R. INOA et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 10, 2011.

No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (DiPasquale v Gutfleish, 74 A.D.3d 471 [2010]). Supreme Court properly denied the motion to renew. The only new facts submitted in support of the motion relate to plaintiff's counsel's attempts to serve defendant Inoa after commencement of the action. Even if counsel provided a reasonable explanation for failing to include those facts in the prior motion, they do not warrant a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases