The consent of respondent to the adoption of the subject child was not required since he did not maintain "substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child" (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]). Respondent admittedly provided no financial support for the child, and the record does not contain any objective evidence of efforts to visit or communicate with the child (see Matter of Marc Jaleel G. [Marc E.G.],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF REGINALD G.
5924
89 A.D.3d 456 (2011)
931 N.Y.S.2d 870
2011 NY Slip Op 7721
In the Matter of JAVON REGINALD G., Also Known as JAVON N.-L. and Another, an Infant. EVERTON REGINALD G., Appellant; EDWIN GOULD SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 3, 2011.
Decided November 3, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.