The record establishes that dismissal of the third-party complaint under CPLR 1010 was a provident exercise of the court's discretion. Defendants third-party plaintiffs delayed in bringing the third-party action until almost a year after the main action for personal injuries was commenced and months after the filing of the note of issue, despite being aware of a potential contractual indemnification claim against third-party defendant (see Grant v Wainer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SKOLNICK v. MAX CONNOR, LLC
5779, 300798/09, 84286/09
89 A.D.3d 443 (2011)
932 N.Y.S.2d 453
2011 NY Slip Op 7716
JOAN SKOLNICK, Plaintiff, v. MAX CONNOR, LLC, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. J. SIEBOLD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 3, 2011.
Decided November 3, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.