1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 89 A.D.3d
  5. 89 A.D.3d 434 (2011)
 

CALOGRIDES v. SPRING SCAFFOLDING, INC.

5882, 16464/06.

89 A.D.3d 434 (2011)

931 N.Y.S.2d 869

2011 NY Slip Op 7704

MICHAEL CALOGRIDES et al., Respondents, v. SPRING SCAFFOLDING, INC., Appellant, CALISTRO CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 1, 2011.

As it is undisputed that Spring is not an owner or contractor or agent for the purposes of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6), the causes of action under those Labor Law sections should be dismissed as against it (see Morales v Spring Scaffolding, Inc., 24 A.D.3d 42 [2005]). The Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims should be dismissed as against Spring because there is no evidence that Spring's initial installation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases