1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 89 A.D.3d
  5. 89 A.D.3d 418 (2011)
 

EMPOSIMATO v. CIFC ACQUISITION CORP.

5508, 601728/08, 590573/08

89 A.D.3d 418 (2011)

932 N.Y.S.2d 33

2011 NY Slip Op 7690

PAUL EMPOSIMATO, JR., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. CIFC ACQUISITION CORP., et al., Respondents-Appellants. CIFC ACQUISITION CORP., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 1, 2011.

The motion court correctly found that in order to invoke the right to terminate pursuant to section 8.1 (e) of the SPA, plaintiffs had to provide schedules to CIFC 30 days before the purported termination on June 6, 2008, that is, by May 7, 2008. Further, the schedules had to be final versions and in reasonable and customary form. Defendants established that the April 14, 2008 schedules were not "final" versions within the meaning of the SPA. Indeed, the e-mail cover letter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases