1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 89 A.D.3d
  5. 89 A.D.3d 407 (2011)
 

HERNANDEZ v. TRUCKING

350664/07, 5902, 5903.

89 A.D.3d 407 (2011)

931 N.Y.S.2d 317

2011 NY Slip Op 7674

NATHANIEL HERNANDEZ et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. ADELANGO TRUCKING et al., Respondents, and ROYAL COACH LINES, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 1, 2011.

Defendants established, prima facie, that the infant plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the 2006 vehicular accident, through the submission of affirmed reports of medical experts, who, upon examination, found that plaintiff had normal ranges of ankle motion and had recovered from an ankle sprain without any disability (see Canelo v Genolg Tr., Inc., 82 A.D.3d 584 [2011]). Moreover, other submissions, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases