Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated September 22, 2010, as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is denied, as no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated July 16, 2010, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated September 22, 2010, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.