Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 7, 2010, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated February 4, 2011, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated February 4, 2011, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioners.
The appellant contends that leave to serve a late notice of claim should have been denied because the claim is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.