1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 88 A.D.3d
  5. 88 A.D.3d 536 (2011)
 

NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD v. MAHADEO

Nos. 5738, 401380/09.

88 A.D.3d 536 (2011)

930 N.Y.S.2d 584

2011 NY Slip Op 7279

NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD, Respondent, v. ROBBY MAHADEO et al., Defendants, and RAY L. TROTMAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 18, 2011.

In this action to recover civil penalties from defendants (see Campaign Finance Act of 1965, codified at Administrative Code of City of NY § 3-701 et seq.), defendant Trotman's argument, that the Board lacked jurisdiction to impose statutory penalties on the defendants because the defendants never received any public matching funds from the Board and because the Board determined, before penalties were imposed, that defendants were not qualified to receive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases