The verdict was based on legally insufficient evidence. In any event, regardless of sufficiency, the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson,
This case involves missing cash at a store where defendant and other persons worked as cashiers. The only evidence purporting to show that it was defendant who stole the money was a recording of a 90-second video surveillance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.