1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 88 A.D.3d
  5. 88 A.D.3d 369 (2011)
 

SEIDEL v. BD. OF ASSESSORS

2010-02740.

88 A.D.3d 369 (2011)

931 N.Y.S.2d 623

2011 NY Slip Op 7061

In the Matter of SHARI SEIDEL et al., Respondents, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS, COUNTY OF NASSAU, et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 4, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ciampoli , County Attorney, Mineola ( Gerald R. Podlesak of counsel), for appellants.

Rosenfeld & Maidenbaum, Cedarhurst ( Mark H. Miller of counsel), for respondents.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

HALL, J.

The principal issue raised on this appeal is whether Nassau County may consider improvements made to real property after the taxable status date in assessing property values for the particular tax year to which the taxable status date applies. Stated differently, the issue is whether Nassau County can use a fluctuating taxable status date based on an improvement which has been made to real property.

Factual and Procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases