The gravamen of petitioner's argument is that the testimonies of the students were incredible as a matter of law due to inconsistencies the Hearing Officer ignored. Contrary to petitioner's contention, however, the Hearing Officer carefully considered all of the testimony and resolved any inconsistencies in favor of the students, as she was entitled to do (see Lackow v Department of Educ. [or "Board"] of City of N.Y.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DOUGLAS v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD/DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
5233, 5234, 114745/08
87 A.D.3d 856 (2011)
929 N.Y.S.2d 127
2011 NY Slip Op 6397
In the Matter of KEITH DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD/DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 1, 2011.
Decided September 1, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.