Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in permitting the prosecution to call an expert witness, a psychologist, to testify about, inter alia, intra-family rape trauma syndrome. The testimony was properly admitted "to explain behavior of ... victim[s] that might appear unusual or that jurors may not be expected to understand" (People v Carroll,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.