OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The respondent was duly served with a petition containing two charges of professional misconduct. He did not serve an answer within the time set forth by the Court's decision and order dated June 3, 2010 (2010 NY Slip Op 73343[U]).
On October 8, 2010, a conference call was conducted between the petitioner, the respondent, and the Special Referee, wherein the respondent stated that he did not dispute the charges; that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.