1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 85 A.D.3d
  5. 85 A.D.3d 963 (2011)
 

FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP. v. FORREST

2010-08216.

85 A.D.3d 963 (2011)

925 N.Y.S.2d 882

2011 NY Slip Op 5449

FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP., Respondent, v. LINDA FORREST, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 21, 2011.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant has failed to demonstrate that the invocation of a court's inherent power to vacate a judgment in the interest of substantial justice is warranted (see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62 [2003]; U.S. Bank N.A. v Slavinski, 78 A.D.3d 1167, 1168 [2010]; Katz v Marra,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases