1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 85 A.D.3d
  5. 85 A.D.3d 628 (2011)
 

MATTER OF SANTIAGO v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY

5400, 260559/08, 5400A.

85 A.D.3d 628 (2011)

925 N.Y.S.2d 500

2011 NY Slip Op 5415

In the Matter of CARLOS SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 23, 2011.

Petitioner's proffered excuse of law office failure does not adequately excuse the delay in serving a notice of claim (see Ordillas v MTA N.Y. City Tr., 50 A.D.3d 391 [2008]). In addition, respondent did not acquire actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within the statutorily prescribed 90-day period or within a reasonable time thereafter (see General Municipal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases