1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 85 A.D.3d
  5. 85 A.D.3d 614 (2011)
 

MOYAL v. MOYAL

3221, 3222, 350058/07, 3222A.

85 A.D.3d 614 (2011)

927 N.Y.S.2d 19

2011 NY Slip Op 5406

DANY MOYAL, Respondent-Appellant, v. MARC MOYAL, Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 23, 2011.

While "[t]here is no uniform rule for fixing the value of a business for the purpose of equitable distribution" (Wasserman v Wasserman, 66 A.D.3d 880, 882 [2009]), the Special Referee did not sufficiently explain her basic concurrence in the valuation of the husband's business by the wife's appraiser (see Capasso v Capasso, 119 A.D.2d 268, 272 [1986]) despite the numerous recognized flaws...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases