1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 85 A.D.3d
  5. 85 A.D.3d 550 (2011)
 

GONZALEZ v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

5352, 114796/05.

85 A.D.3d 550 (2011)

925 N.Y.S.2d 462

2011 NY Slip Op 5190

ENOOS GONZALEZ, Respondent, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, Appellant-Respondent, and T.U.C.S. CLEANING SERVICE, INC., Respondent-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 16, 2011.

The Port Authority failed to establish that it timely filed its cross motion (see Corchado v City of New York, 64 A.D.3d 429 [2009]). Counsel's statement in a reply affirmation that it timely served an affirmation in support of the cross motion is unsupported by any claim of personal knowledge. Accordingly, it is without evidentiary value and thus unavailing (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases