Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The County Court, at the 2009 resentencing, properly performed the limited function of correcting what amounted to a clerical error in the pronouncement of the County Court's original 2003 sentence (see generally People v Lingle,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.