Defendant did not preserve his claim that, in order to prove burglary in this case, the People were required to prove defendant intended to commit a sexual assault, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The indictment charged defendant with entering a store with intent to commit an unspecified crime therein, and the People never limited their theory of the case to any particular intended crime ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.