When this case was originally before us, defendant argued, inter alia, that the trial court erred in running his sentences for the burglary convictions consecutively with the sentences for the larceny convictions. Alternatively, defendant argued that the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences for the burglary and larceny convictions was excessive. We held that the trial court erred as a matter of law in imposing consecutive sentences and modified the judgment to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
