There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court should have suppressed the statements he made to investigators at the State Police barracks. The record supports the Supreme Court's conclusion that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his Fifth Amendment rights and that the inculpatory statements he made after being advised of his constitutional rights...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
