The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's sole challenge to the prompt showup identification is his claim that the police should have also shown the victim a second possible suspect. Police radio communications indicated that at the time the police stopped defendant, who met a detailed description of the alleged robber, another team of officers stopped a second man several blocks away, allegedly in response to the same radioed description. This...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
