Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court committed reversible error in permitting the jurors to take notes during a requested readback of a portion of the jury charge without providing cautionary instructions is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant neither objected to the note-taking nor requested that the court give a cautionary instruction (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.