Plaintiff was not deprived of her right to a fair trial by the court's refusal to permit her counsel to conduct re-cross-examination of two witnesses. Although it would have been better if the court had allowed at least some re-cross-examination, in this case, it was harmless error. The only possible scope of inquiry for plaintiff's denied re-cross-examination, as would have been limited by the scope of the prior redirect (see Matter of Eberhart v Ward,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PERALTA v. GRENADIER REALTY CORP.
4756, 21364/03.
84 A.D.3d 486 (2011)
923 N.Y.S.2d 63
ANA RAMONA PERALTA, Appellant, v. GRENADIER REALTY CORP. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 10, 2011.
Decided May 10, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
