Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that, based on the plaintiff's filings with the Supreme Court, the attorney who commenced the action on the plaintiff's behalf did not maintain an office "for the transaction of law business" within this State in violation of Judiciary Law § 470. In opposition,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.