Defendant did not preserve his claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he acted in concert with the person who actually shot the victim, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. Furthermore, in the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ENRIQUEZ
4944, 3378/07.
84 A.D.3d 440 (2011)
922 N.Y.S.2d 72
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARIEL ENRIQUEZ, Also Known as ARIEL HENRIQUEZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 3, 2011.
Decided May 3, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
