Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Since the County Court correctly determined that Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a) required that the defendant's sentence run consecutively to his previously imposed undischarged sentence, the defendant's contention that the County Court erred in failing to consider whether it should order the sentences to run concurrently is without merit (see Penal Law §§ 70.06, 70.25 [2-a]; Matter of Ramos v Connolly,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.