Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgments are affirmed.
There is no evidence in the record to support the defendant's contention that the sentencing court and his counsel incorrectly believed that the imposition of consecutive sentences was mandatory. In any event, the defendant agreed to the imposition of consecutive sentences as part of his plea agreements. Under the circumstances, the defendant failed to show that he was deprived of the effective assistance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.