Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he knew the vehicle he was using was stolen, as required for a conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (see Penal Law § 165.45). However, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.