The parties agree that this Court need look no further than the "clear language" contained in the "four corners" of the agreement, but differ on their interpretation of the asserted clear language. Under the "clear language" rule of contract interpretation, we disregard extrinsic evidence if there is, as the parties agree, no ambiguity, and look only to the language of the agreement (see R/S Assoc. v New York Job Dev. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
1701 RESTAURANT ON SECOND, INC. v. ARMATO PROPERTIES, INC.
4815, 4815A, 110983/06.
83 A.D.3d 526 (2011)
921 N.Y.S.2d 238
1701 RESTAURANT ON SECOND, INC., Respondent, v. ARMATO PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 19, 2011.
Decided April 19, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.