The motion court properly granted summary judgment to NYCHA and the City as to the claims against them alleging false arrest, malicious prosecution, and violation of civil rights under 42 USC § 1983. As to the false arrest and malicious prosecution claims, the record establishes that NYCHA, the City and their employees did not participate in the arrest or prosecution of plaintiff except as witnesses (see Mesiti v Wegman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
NARVAEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK
4802, 116134/04.
83 A.D.3d 516 (2011)
922 N.Y.S.2d 12
LYNN NARVAEZ, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 14, 2011.
Decided April 14, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.