The contract contained a merger clause setting forth that plaintiff accepted the building "as is" after having had an opportunity to inspect the premises. The provision specifically disclaimed reliance on any representations as to the physical condition of the building. Thus, the merger clause extinguished any claims arising from defendants' alleged misrepresentations that the building did not have a bedbug problem (see Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
85-87 PITT STREET, LLC v. 85-87 PITT STREET REALTY CORPORATION
4723, 601341/09.
83 A.D.3d 446 (2011)
921 N.Y.S.2d 40
85-87 PITT STREET, LLC, Appellant, v. 85-87 PITT STREET REALTY CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 7, 2011.
Decided April 7, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
