Ordered that the order dated November 9, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to renew his opposition to the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, which had been granted by the Supreme Court in an earlier order. "A motion for leave to renew must be `based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.