The verified complaint alleged a contract to perform telephone services by plaintiff for defendants for a stated fee, and defendants' failure to pay. However, the complaint does not allege that appellant was a party to the contract individually, so as to bind him to its terms. "Some proof of liability is . . . required to satisfy the court as to the prima facie validity of . . . uncontested cause of action" (Feffer v Malpeso,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION v. H & A LOCKSMITH, INC.
4683, 100970/08.
82 A.D.3d 674 (2011)
920 N.Y.S.2d 74
MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Respondent, v. H & A LOCKSMITH, INC., et al., Defendants, and ARIQ VANUNU, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 31, 2011.
Decided March 31, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
