The court erred in granting plaintiffs partial summary judgment based solely on its finding that a notation on a document created by defendants but consisting of information supplied entirely by plaintiffs constituted an admission by defendants. It is clear from the face of the document that defendants did not "manifest[] an adoption or belief" in the truth of its contents and, as such, the notation cannot constitute an admission (Addo v Melnick,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BONDY & SCHLOSS v. STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC
4596, 101203/09.
82 A.D.3d 615 (2011)
918 N.Y.S.2d 722
BONDY & SCHLOSS et al., Respondents, v. STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 24, 2011.
Decided March 24, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.